倍分法DID:一组参考文献

发布时间:2020-10-16 阅读 41

Stata 连享会   主页 || 视频 || 推文

温馨提示: 定期 清理浏览器缓存,可以获得最佳浏览体验。

课程详情 https://gitee.com/arlionn/Course   |   lianxh.cn

课程主页 https://gitee.com/arlionn/Course

倍分法 参考文献 (DID References)

Source: Callaway, B., P. H. Sant'Anna, 2020, Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods, arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09015. -PDF-. Code to implement the methods proposed in the paper is available in the R package did which is available on CRAN, CRAN-Tsinghua.

  • Abadie, A. (2005), “Semiparametric difference-in-difference estimators,” Review of Economic Studies, 72, 1–19.
  • Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G., and Wooldridge, J. (2017), “When should you adjust standard errors for clustering?,” Working Paper.
  • Abbring, J. H., and van den Berg, G. J. (2003), “The nonparametric identification of treatment effects in duration models,” Econometrica, 71(5), 1491–1517.
  • Athey, S., and Imbens, G. W. (2006), “Identification and inference in nonlinear difference in differences models,” Econometrica, 74(2), 431–497.
  • Athey, S., and Imbens, G. W. (2018), “Design-based analysis in difference-in-differences settings with staggered adoption,” Working Paper.
  • Bailey, M. J., and Goodman-Bacon, A. (2015), “The war on poverty’s experiment in public medicine: Community health centers and the mortality of older Americans,” American Economic Review, 105(3), 1067–1104.
  • Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Fern´andez-Val, I., and Hansen, C. (2017), “Program evaluation and causal inference with high-dimensional data,” Econometrica, 85(1), 233–298.
  • Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., and Mullainathan, S. (2004), “How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.
  • Bojinov, I., Rambachan, A., and Shephard, N. (2020), “Panel Experiments and Dynamic Causal Effects: A Finite Population Perspective,” Working Paper.
  • Bonhomme, S., and Sauder, U. (2011), “Recovering distributions in difference-in-differences models: A comparison of selective and comprehensive schooling,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(May), 479–494.
  • Borusyak, K., and Jaravel, X. (2017), “Revisiting event study designs,” Working Paper.
  • Botosaru, I., and Gutierrez, F. H. (2018), “Difference-in-differences when the treatment status is observed in only one period,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 33(1), 73–90.
  • Busso, M., Dinardo, J., and McCrary, J. (2014), “New evidence on the finite sample properties of propensity score reweighting and matching estimators,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(5), 885–895.
  • Callaway, B., Li, T., and Oka, T. (2018), “Quantile treatment effects in difference in differences models under dependence restrictions and with only two time periods,” Journal of Econometrics, 206(2), 395–413.
  • Card, D., and Krueger, A. B. (1994), “Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania,” American Economic Review, 84(4), 772–793.
  • Chen, X., Hong, H., and Tarozzi, A. (2008), “Semiparametric efficiency in GMM models with auxiliary data,” The Annals of Statistics, 36(2), 808–843.
  • Chen, X., Linton, O., and Van Keilegom, I. (2003), “Estimation of semiparametric models when the criterion function is not smooth,” Econometrica, 71(5), 1591–1608.
  • Cheng, G., Yu, Z., and Huang, J. Z. (2013), “The cluster bootstrap consistency in generalized estimating equations,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 115, 33–47.
  • Chernozhukov, V., Fern´andez-Val, I., Hahn, J., and Newey, W. (2013), “Average and quantile effects in nonseparable panel models,” Econometrica, 81(2), 535–580.
  • Chernozhukov, V., Fern´andez-Val, I., and Luo, Y. (2017), “The sorted effects method: Discovering heterogeneous effects beyond their averages,” Working Paper.
  • Conley, T., and Taber, C. (2011), “Inference with “difference in differences” with a small number of policy changes,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 113–125.
  • Crump, R. K., Hotz, V. J., Imbens, G. W., and Mitnik, O. A. (2009), “Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects,” Biometrika, 96(1), 187–199.
  • de Chaisemartin, C., and D’Haultfœuille, X. (2017), “Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences,” The Review of Economic Studies, 85, 999–1028.
  • de Chaisemartin, C., and D’Haultfœuille, X. (2020), “Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects,” American Economic Review, .
  • Dube, A., Lester, T. W., and Reich, M. (2010), “Minimum wage effects across state borders: Estimates using contiguous counties,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 945–964.
  • Dube, A., Lester, T. W., and Reich, M. (2016), “Minimum wage shocks, employment flows, and labor market frictions,” Journal of Labor Economics, 34(3), 663–704.
  • Farber, H. S. (2017), “Employment, hours, and earnings consequences of job loss: US evidence from the displaced workers survey,” Journal of Labor Economics, 35(S1), S235–S272.
  • Ferman, B., and Pinto, C. (2018), “Inference in differences-in-differences with few treated groups and heteroskedasticity,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, p. rest a 00759.
  • Freyberger, J., and Rai, Y. (2018), “Uniform confidence bands: Characterization and optimality,” Journal of Econometrics, Forthcoming.
  • Gibbons, C. E., Su´arez Serrato, J. C., and Urbancic, M. B. (2018), “Broken or Fixed Effects?,” Journal of Econometric Methods, 8(1).
  • Goodman-Bacon, A. (2018), “Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing,” Working Paper.
  • Graham, B., Pinto, C., and Egel, D. (2012), “Inverse probability tilting for moment condition models with missing data,” The Review of Economic Studies, 79(3), 1053–1079.
  • H´ajek, J. (1971), “Discussion of ‘An essay on the logical foundations of survey sampling, Part I’, by D. Basu,” in Foundations of Statistical Inference, eds. V. P. Godambe, and D. A. Sprott, Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Han, S. (2019), “Identification in nonparametric models for dynamic treatment effects,” Journal of Econometrics, pp. 1–21.
  • Heckman, J. J., Humphries, J. E., and Veramendi, G. (2016), “Dynamic treatment effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 191(2), 276–292.
  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., and Todd, P. (1998), “Characterizing selection bias using experimental data,” Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–1098.
  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., and Todd, P. (1997), “Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme,” The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.
  • Imai, K., Kim, I. S., and Wang, E. (2018), “Matching methods for causal inference with time-series cross-section data,” Working Paper.
  • Khan, S., and Tamer, E. (2010), “Irregular Identification, Support Conditions, and Inverse Weight Estimation,” Econometrica, 78(6), 2021–2042.
  • Kline, P., and Santos, A. (2012), “A score based approach to wild bootstrap inference,” Journal of Econometric Methods, 1(1), 1–40.
  • Kosorok, M. R. (2008), Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference, New York, NY: Springer.
  • Laporte, A., and Windmeijer, F. (2005), “Estimation of panel data models with binary indicators when treatment effects are not constant over time,” Economics Letters, 88(3), 389–396.
  • MacKinnon, J. G., and Webb, M. D. (2016), “Randomization inference for difference-in-differences with few treated clusters,” Working Paper.
  • MacKinnon, J. G., and Webb, M. D. (2018), “The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters,” The Econometrics Journal, 21(2), 114–135.
  • Malani, A., and Reif, J. (2015), “Interpreting pre-trends as anticipation: Impact on estimated treatment effects from tort reform,” Journal of Public Economics, 124, 1–17.
  • Mammen, E. (1993), “Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models,” The Annals of Statistics, 21(1), 255–285.
  • Marcus, M., and Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2020), “The role of parallel trends in event study settings : An application to environmental economics,” Working Paper, pp. 1–48.
  • McCrary, J. (2007), “The effect of court-ordered hiring quotas on the composition and quality of police,” American Economic Review, 97(1), 318–353.
  • Meer, J., and West, J. (2016), “Effects of the minimum wage on employment dynamics,” Journal of Human Resources, 51(2), 500–522.
  • Montiel Olea, J. L., and Plagborg-Møller, M. (2018), “Simultaneous confidence bands: Theory, implementation,
  • and an application to SVARs,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, pp. 1–64.
  • Murphy, S. A. (2003), “Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 65(2), 331–366.
  • Murphy, S. A., Van der Laan, M. J., Robins, J. M., Bierman, K. L., Coie, J. D., Greenberg, M. T., Lochman, J. E., McMahon, R. J., and Pinderhughes, E. (2001), “Marginal mean models for dynamic regimes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(456), 1410–1423.
  • Neumark, D., and Wascher, W. (2000), “Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Comment,” American Economic Review, 90(5), 1362–1396.
  • Neumark, D., and Wascher, W. L. (2008), Minimum Wages, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Newey, W. K., and McFadden, D. (1994), “Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4, Amsterdam: North-Holland: Elsevier, chapter 36, pp. 2111–2245.
  • Oreopoulos, P., von Wachter, T., and Heisz, A. (2012), “The short- and long-term career effects of graduating in a recession,” Applied Economics, 4(1), 1–29.
  • Qin, J., and Zhang, B. (2008), “Empirical-likelihood-based difference-in-differences estimators,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 75(8), 329–349.
  • Robins, J. (1987), “Addendum To ’A New Approach To Causal Inference in Mortality Studies With a Sustained Exposure Period - Application To Control of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect’.,” Computers and Mathematics with Application, 14, 923–945.
  • Robins, J. M. (1986), “A new approach To causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period - Application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect,” Mathematical Modelling, 7, 1393–1512.
  • Roth, J. (2020), “Pre-test with caution: Event-study estimates after testing for parallel trends,” Working Paper, pp. 1–84.
  • Rubin, D. B. (2007), “The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials,” Statistics in Medicine, 26(1), 20–36.
  • Rubin, D. B. (2008), “For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis,” Annals of Applied Statistics, 2(3), 808–840.
  • Sant’Anna, P. H. C., and Song, X. (2019), “Specification tests for the propensity score,” Journal of Econometrics, 210, 379–404.
  • Sant’Anna, P. H., and Zhao, J. (2020), “Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators,” Journal of Econometrics, .
  • Sherman, M., and Le Cessie, S. (2007), “A comparison between bootstrap methods and generalized estimating equations for correlated outcomes in generalized linear models,” Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 26(3), 901–925.
  • Sianesi, B. (2004), “An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labor market programs in the 1990s,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 133–155.
  • S loczy´nski, T. (2020), “Interpreting OLS estimands when treatment effects are heterogeneous: Smaller groups get larger weights,” Review of Economics and Statistics, .
  • Sun, L., and Abraham, S. (2020), “Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects,” Working Paper.
  • van der Vaart, A. W. (1998), Asymptotic Statistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • van der Vaart, A. W., and Wellner, J. A. (1996), Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes, New York: Springer.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2003), “Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics,” American Economic Review P&P, 93(2), 133–138.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2005a), “Fixed-effects and related estimators for correlated random-coefficient and treatmenteffect panel data models,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 385–390.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2005b), “Violating ignorability of treatment by controlling for too many factors,” Econometric Theory, 21(5), 1026–1028.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2007), “Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems,” Journal of Econometrics, 141(2), 1281–1301.
  • Yang, S., and Ding, P. (2018), “Asymptotic inference of causal effects with observational studies trimmed by the estimated propensity scores,” Biometrika, 105(2), 487–493.

相关课程

连享会-直播课 上线了!
http://lianxh.duanshu.com

免费公开课:


课程一览

支持回看,所有课程可以随时购买观看。

专题 嘉宾 直播/回看视频
最新专题 DSGE, 因果推断, 空间计量等
Stata数据清洗 游万海 直播, 2 小时,已上线
研究设计 连玉君 我的特斯拉-实证研究设计-幻灯片-
面板模型 连玉君 动态面板模型-幻灯片-
面板模型 连玉君 直击面板数据模型 [免费公开课,2小时]

Note: 部分课程的资料,PPT 等可以前往 连享会-直播课 主页查看,下载。


关于我们

  • Stata连享会 由中山大学连玉君老师团队创办,定期分享实证分析经验。直播间 有很多视频课程,可以随时观看。
  • 连享会-主页知乎专栏,300+ 推文,实证分析不再抓狂。
  • 公众号推文分类: 计量专题 | 分类推文 | 资源工具。推文分成 内生性 | 空间计量 | 时序面板 | 结果输出 | 交乘调节 五类,主流方法介绍一目了然:DID, RDD, IV, GMM, FE, Probit 等。
  • 公众号关键词搜索/回复 功能已经上线。大家可以在公众号左下角点击键盘图标,输入简要关键词,以便快速呈现历史推文,获取工具软件和数据下载。常见关键词:课程, 直播, 视频, 客服, 模型设定, 研究设计, stata, plus, 绘图, 编程, 面板, 论文重现, 可视化, RDD, DID, PSM, 合成控制法

连享会主页  lianxh.cn
连享会主页 lianxh.cn

连享会小程序:扫一扫,看推文,看视频……

扫码加入连享会微信群,提问交流更方便

✏ 连享会学习群-常见问题解答汇总:
https://gitee.com/arlionn/WD